Crypto mixers in the context of compliance and forensics: System types, legal developments and limits of investigation

Hand reaching to touch a glowing data dashboard with neon blue and orange graphs and charts in a futuristic tech setting.

This article provides a systematic classification of crypto mixers for legal and compliance practice: operating principle, custodial and non-custodial mixers, zero-knowledge proofs for Tornado Cash, CoinJoin procedures, privacy coins, DeFi-based layering, recent legal developments regarding sanctions and operator prosecution, forensic investigation limits, and the role of centralized exchanges.

Case report on the crypto love scam: forensic investigation and asset recovery in the international scam network

Smartphone resting on a circuit board with a glowing pink heart on the screen, blue and red lights around it

This article documents a real-life crypto love scam with a total loss of €184,000 and describes the forensic methodology used: transaction reconstruction, peel chain detection, cross-chain tracking between TRON, Ethereum and BNB Chain, AI-supported wallet clustering, and the International Preservation Request, which led to the recovery of €112,000 – with lessons learned for legal representation.

Crypto assets in divorce proceedings: equalization of accrued gains, valuation and forensic asset determination

Crypto assets in divorce: How the equalization of accrued gains works, what obligations spouses have and when blockchain forensics becomes necessary.

Crypto assets are becoming increasingly relevant in divorce proceedings. High volatility, anonymous wallets, and complex DeFi structures complicate the division of assets for equalization of accrued gains. This article explains the legal classification, valuation date, disclosure obligations, tax implications, and shows when a forensic asset assessment becomes necessary to ensure a fair division.

Cryptocurrency losses in cases of fraud: Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) case law as a basis for argumentation

Cryptocurrency losses in cases of fraud: Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) case law

Clients who have suffered cryptocurrency losses due to fraud often fail to convince their clients by arguing that a classic sale transaction is lacking. However, the Federal Fiscal Court's (BFH) case law provides robust approaches: economic analysis, definitive asset losses, and the objective net principle. This article demonstrates how tax advisors and lawyers apply these lines of argumentation and what role forensic evidence preparation plays in this process.

Crypto fraud tax 2026: When losses are tax-deductible

Crypto fraud tax 2026: When losses from scam cases can be deducted according to § 23 EStG – legal situation, case groups and forensic evidence.

Cryptocurrency losses due to fraud are difficult to tax – but not always impossible. This article shows law firms and tax advisors when a loss can be deducted under Section 23 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG), which categories of cases are relevant, and what forensic evidence tax authorities will expect for tax recognition in 2026.

Crypto tax 2026: Legally compliant documentation for complex transactions

Crypto tax

Banks are freezing accounts, cryptocurrency exchanges are blocking withdrawals – and a tax export is no longer sufficient proof. This article explains what DAC8 and the Transfer of Funds Regulation 2026 mean for lawyers and compliance departments, what requirements banks now impose, and what a forensic proof of the origin of funds specifically documents.