Crypto assets in divorce proceedings: equalization of accrued gains, valuation and forensic asset determination
Crypto assets are becoming increasingly relevant in divorce proceedings. High volatility, anonymous wallets, and complex DeFi structures complicate the division of assets for equalization of accrued gains. This article explains the legal classification, valuation date, disclosure obligations, tax implications, and shows when a forensic asset assessment becomes necessary to ensure a fair division.
Cryptocurrency losses in cases of fraud: Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) case law as a basis for argumentation
Clients who have suffered cryptocurrency losses due to fraud often fail to convince their clients by arguing that a classic sale transaction is lacking. However, the Federal Fiscal Court's (BFH) case law provides robust approaches: economic analysis, definitive asset losses, and the objective net principle. This article demonstrates how tax advisors and lawyers apply these lines of argumentation and what role forensic evidence preparation plays in this process.
Crypto fraud tax 2026: When losses are tax-deductible
Cryptocurrency losses due to fraud are difficult to tax – but not always impossible. This article shows law firms and tax advisors when a loss can be deducted under Section 23 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG), which categories of cases are relevant, and what forensic evidence tax authorities will expect for tax recognition in 2026.
Crypto tax 2026: Legally compliant documentation for complex transactions
Banks are freezing accounts, cryptocurrency exchanges are blocking withdrawals – and a tax export is no longer sufficient proof. This article explains what DAC8 and the Transfer of Funds Regulation 2026 mean for lawyers and compliance departments, what requirements banks now impose, and what a forensic proof of the origin of funds specifically documents.
Proof of Origin of Funds for Cryptocurrencies 2026: What Lawyers and Compliance Departments Need to Know
Banks are freezing accounts, cryptocurrency exchanges are blocking withdrawals – and a tax export is no longer sufficient proof. This article explains what DAC8 and the Transfer of Funds Regulation 2026 mean for lawyers and compliance departments, what requirements banks now impose, and what a forensic proof of the origin of funds specifically documents.
Crypto fraud: What forensic blockchain analysis can do for lawyers
Without a forensic basis, any criminal complaint for crypto fraud remains incomplete. This article explains what a court-admissible blockchain report provides, how OSINT investigations enable perpetrator identification, and when forensic support is crucial in a case.
Recovery Scam after Crypto Fraud – Providers and Structures
Recovery Scam: How perpetrators harm investment and crypto fraud victims a second time. Characteristics, domains, criminal law & forensic options for lawyers.
Astra Veritas: Recovery scam after crypto fraud?
Astra Veritas (astra-legalberatung.com) presents itself as a provider for the recovery of lost cryptocurrencies. From a forensic perspective, the described procedure structurally corresponds to a classic recovery scam. The analysis reveals typical payment patterns, advance payment demands, and a lack of service delivery. A methodically documented blockchain analysis is crucial for criminal and civil proceedings.
CAPITALIKO (capitaliko.com) – Warnings about potential online trading fraud
CAPITALIKO (capitaliko.com) advertises high returns in online trading. Indications of a lack of regulation and payout problems give cause for caution.
Berg Fin and Berg Finance – suspected trading fraud
Berg Fin and Berg Finance are suspected of using problematic trading structures. This article examines payment flow analysis, crypto forensics, and legally sound investigations.